The root already set CMAKE_AUTOMOC; add CMAKE_AUTOUIC and CMAKE_AUTORCC
next to it and drop the per-directory copies from 18 CMakeLists files.
These variables are inherited by the subdirectories, so the duplicates
never changed anything.
qt_standard_project_setup is not used: besides the AUTO* variables it
sets CMAKE_RUNTIME_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY on Windows, which breaks the
install(DIRECTORY "$<TARGET_FILE_DIR:...>") copies and the per-app
symbol paths, and appends to CMAKE_INSTALL_RPATH on Linux.
Co-authored-by: Lukas Brübach <Bruebach.Lukas@bdosecurity.de>
* [CI] Make the hdiutil retry wrapper report failure
CPack reads the wrapper's exit status to decide whether the disk image was
created, so a zero exit turns a failed hdiutil into a later "Problem copying
the package" error that hides hdiutil's own message.
- Propagate hdiutil's real status instead of collapsing every failure to 1.
- Name the failing subcommand (create/attach/detach/convert) so the message
says which CPack step gave up.
- Count attempts rather than failures in the retry line.
* Update .ci/compile.sh
Co-authored-by: tooomm <tooomm@users.noreply.github.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Lukas Brübach <Bruebach.Lukas@bdosecurity.de>
Co-authored-by: tooomm <tooomm@users.noreply.github.com>
checkUserPassword ignored force_password_change on the challenge-response
path, so a reset password stayed valid. Returning PasswordChangeRequired
was not enough on its own: the session was dropped and the client told the
user to ask the administrator for the temporary password they had just used.
The pending session now keeps its identity without registering a user
session or announcing a join, may only ping and change its password, and
the client completes the change in-session before reconnecting.
Co-authored-by: Lukas Brübach <Bruebach.Lukas@bdosecurity.de>
The temporary password was written as a legacy salt+hash row, which makes the
next login look like an authentication downgrade. A client holding a saved
verifier refuses that downgrade, so the reset locked the account out of every
modern client.
Store the verifier and, where security/legacy_backup_key is configured, keep a
sealed legacy hash of the same temporary password as the downgrade backup, so
pre-challenge clients keep the credential path the reset used to provide.
Without the key no row shape serves both: the verifier and the legacy hash
cannot share one column, so those clients have no path at all. Warn at reset
time that the new password has no pre-challenge path, and say so in
servatrice.ini.example instead of promising that a reset gets them back in.
Co-authored-by: Lukas Brübach <Bruebach.Lukas@bdosecurity.de>
ZoneViewZone::initializeCards() connected PendingCommand::finished only after ZoneViewZoneLogic::requestZoneDump() had already sent the command. Local games process the dump synchronously, so finished was emitted before the view connected and the library/sideboard view stayed empty.
Split requestZoneDump() into prepareZoneDump() and sendZoneDump(), and connect before sending, matching the TabRoom prepare/send convention.
Co-authored-by: Lukas Brübach <Bruebach.Lukas@bdosecurity.de>
* [CardDB] Drop the CardInfo self pointer
The weak self pointer had to be assigned right after every construction,
and a missed assignment silently stopped change notifications. CardInfo
is always owned by a QSharedPointer, so it now derives from
QEnableSharedFromThis<CardInfo> and asks for sharedFromThis() instead:
nothing to initialize, and the CardSet cycle stays broken.
CardSet::newInstance() also loses the commented-out self-pointer
assignment left over from the same design.
* [CardDB] Pin the cardInfoChanged contract without the self pointer
Dropping CardInfo's self pointer moved change notifications onto
QEnableSharedFromThis, so the signal now rests on the card being owned by
a QSharedPointer. Two tests pin that down:
- A property change on a card owned by a CardDatabase still emits
cardInfoChanged() carrying that card, which is what the card database
views and models listen to.
- clone() starts out unowned, so a change to the clone is reported as the
clone's and must not reach the original's observers.
* [CardDB] Treat an unowned CardInfo as a bug, not a no-op
Every CardInfo is built inside a QSharedPointer (both factory overloads
and clone()), and no constructor notifies anyone, so sharedFromThis() is
always available by the time addToSet() or a setter runs. Assert that and
warn in a released build, instead of silently skipping the notification
or the set append.
The copy constructor keeps its explicit QEnableSharedFromThis
initializer: GCC's -Wextra warns about the uninitialized base in every
translation unit that copies a CardInfo otherwise. A comment there
records that the clone deliberately starts unowned.
* [CardDB] Break the CardInfo <-> CardSet cycle on reload
CardSet is a QList<CardInfoPtr> and CardInfo::addToSet() appends the card
to its sets, while a card keeps a CardSetPtr per printing in
setsToPrintings. The sets therefore hold strong references back to the
cards, and the previous database snapshot stayed alive after a reload, so
RSS grew by roughly a second database on every reload.
Empty the sets before the cards are dropped: CardDatabase::clear() and
swapInDatabaseData() clear the sets before replacing the containers, and
removeCard() detaches the card from its sets, so nothing keeps a card
alive on behalf of a set once the database lets go of it.
Two tests pin the behaviour: a reload and a clear() must drop the last
strong reference to a card from the previous snapshot.
* [CardDB] Keep the set detach in one place
clear() and swapInDatabaseData() both emptied every set before dropping the
cards, so share that as detachSetMembership() instead of two copies that have
to stay in sync.
removeCard() now detaches through the first printing of each set directly, the
same way CardInfo::newInstance() appends, instead of an inner loop that always
breaks after the first item.
Because clear() empties the sets up front, its per-card detach was walking
every card's printings to remove it from sets that were already empty. Split
removeCard() into the per-card detach and unindexCard(), and let clear() call
only the latter.
* [CardDB] Test that removeCard detaches the card from its set
removeCard() is the one teardown path a caller can trigger for a single card
(the token editor uses it), and it now detaches the card from its sets as
well. Without that detach the set's strong CardInfoPtr keeps the removed card
alive forever, which is exactly what the reload and clear tests pin for the
whole-snapshot paths.
The test loads the fixture, removes Cat, and requires the card to be gone from
the CAT set and to be destroyed once the test drops its own reference.
* [Servatrice] Drop the settings cache from the logger
#7602 removed #include "settingscache.h" from server_logger.cpp but left
isLoggingEnabled() reading settingsCache, so master no longer compiles: the
servatrice target fails on the undeclared global and server_logger_test, which
compiles the same file without main.cpp, fails to link it.
The same commit made reloadConfig() the single place that stores writelog and
the log filters, precisely so logging threads stop reading the global QSettings.
isLoggingEnabled() now mirrors logMessage() and reads those members instead: the
console is a sink of its own, and the logfile needs an open file plus writelog.
The mutex is mutable so the const query can take it.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lukas Brübach <Bruebach.Lukas@bdosecurity.de>
* [Servatrice] Fix silently broken socket error connections
QAbstractSocket::error() was removed in Qt 6 in favour of errorOccurred(). The ISL interface connected to the old name through SIGNAL(), which compiles but fails at runtime, so catchSocketError never ran. The WebSocket interface used the same name on QWebSocket, where it still exists but is deprecated since 6.5.
Use errorOccurred for both. The WebSocket connect needs a lambda because catchSocketError is a protected base-class slot and a base pointer-to-member is not accessible from the derived class.
* [Servatrice] Guard the WebSocket error connect against Qt 6.4
QWebSocket gained errorOccurred in 6.5 and dropped the error signal with it, so
the typed connect cannot compile against the 6.4 floor that Debian 12 and
Ubuntu 24.04 still use. Keep the typed connect on 6.5+ and fall back to the
old-style connect below it, which is what the code did before.
Verified both branches compile: forcing the guard to the else path and
rebuilding serversocketinterface.cpp succeeds, so the 6.4 spelling is intact.
* [Servatrice] Initialize ISL serverId before authentication
catchSocketError() removes islInterfaces[serverId], but the incoming
connection constructor left serverId uninitialized until initServer()
set it after the SSL handshake and certificate check. A socket error
during waitForEncrypted() therefore read an indeterminate key.
* [Servatrice] Correct the QWebSocket error signal note
error() was deprecated in 6.5, not removed; errorOccurred() was added in
6.5.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lukas Brübach <Bruebach.Lukas@bdosecurity.de>
* [Servatrice] Exit non-zero when server initialization fails
initServer() reported every startup failure through a zero exit code: the
database could not be opened, the server printed nothing of its own, and the
process looked like a clean shutdown. Log the two refusal reasons at critical
level and return 1 so supervisors and the Docker exit status can tell the
difference.
* [Servatrice] Keep console logging independent of the logfile
logMessage() returned before the console echo unless a logfile was open and
server/writelog was true, so --log-to-console produced nothing when
server/logfile was empty or could not be opened. That is how a refused database
connection could end in a silent exit.
Print to the console before the logfile gates, drop the duplicate echo from
flushBuffer(), and read writelog/logfilters once in main instead of calling the
non-thread-safe global QSettings from every logging thread.
* [Servatrice] Uninstall the log handler before tearing down globals
The handler reaches into the global logger and settingsCache. Leaving it
installed while main deletes those objects turns any Qt warning emitted during
QCoreApplication/QFactoryLoader teardown into a use-after-free; with
QT_DEBUG_PLUGINS=1 that warning exists, and Servatrice died with SIGSEGV in
QSettings::value() on the way out.
* [Servatrice] Buffer console logs on the logger thread
Address review feedback on the startup failure change:
- Append console lines to a buffer drained by the logger thread, so a
stalled stdout reader cannot block game threads.
- Report islServer->errorString() instead of the literal call text.
- Let the constructor reuse reloadConfig() instead of parsing the filter
list twice.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lukas Brübach <Bruebach.Lukas@bdosecurity.de>
* [Build] Use versionless Qt CMake commands
Replace the versioned qt6_add_executable, qt6_add_resources, qt6_add_shaders,\nqt6_add_translations and qt6_wrap_cpp calls with their unversioned forms.\nAll five are documented as available at the project's 6.4 minimum and accept\nthe same arguments.\n\nVerification: full client, Oracle, server and test build passed.
* versionless qt_finalize_target and _project
---------
Co-authored-by: Lukas Brübach <Bruebach.Lukas@bdosecurity.de>
Co-authored-by: tooomm <tooomm@users.noreply.github.com>
Add the deprecation cutoff after FindQtRuntime so the compiler rejects any
API deprecated before the project's minimum Qt version. Qt 6.5 renamed the
switch, so the fallback name is used on 6.4.
The full client, Oracle, server and test build passes with the cutoff
enabled.
Co-authored-by: Lukas Brübach <Bruebach.Lukas@bdosecurity.de>
The cache action creates its directory only when a prefix matches an entry, and it reads that directory unguarded when it saves, so a scope nobody has written to yet fails the job. Create it up front on every outcome, and fall back to the workspace path when the cache step was skipped and set no path output.
Co-authored-by: opencode <opencode@local>
The 13 libraries using qt6_wrap_cpp(MOC_SOURCES ${HEADERS}) listed their\nheaders twice and depended on a generated source list. Add the headers to the\ntarget sources directly and delete the qt6_wrap_cpp call; AUTOMOC scans them\nand generates the same moc output.\n\nThe change exposed that server_card_counter_test never defined the rng global\nthat the server remote library references; every sibling server test does.\nGive the test the same definition so the target links.\n\nVerification: full client, Oracle, server and test build passed.
Co-authored-by: Lukas Brübach <Bruebach.Lukas@bdosecurity.de>
* [Refactor] Move game logic into libcockatrice_game
* [Refactor] Include card_state.h in player_actions.h
* [Game] Inject settings providers into libcockatrice_game, drop Widgets
* [Game] Follow base rename to createCardRequested after rebase
* [Game] Drop unused CardItem forward declaration
* [Game] Fix includes after moving game logic into libcockatrice_game
---------
Co-authored-by: Lukas Brübach <Bruebach.Lukas@bdosecurity.de>
* [Refactor] Move card item creation out of game logic
* [Game] Rename signal to createCardRequested per review
* [Game] Move attachment bookkeeping onto CardState
CardState::setAttachedTo now maintains the attachedCards graph, resets the
grid point and emits the zone events itself, so game logic no longer needs
to reach into the CardItem graphics item. CardItem::setAttachedTo delegates
to the state and keeps only the view teardown (deleteLater).
---------
Co-authored-by: Lukas Brübach <Bruebach.Lukas@bdosecurity.de>
* [Refactor] Retype card containers and zone logic onto CardState
* [Game] Restore attach bookkeeping via CardItem and repaint on state change
* [Refactor] Give custom zones a hidden graphics owner
Custom PileZoneLogic zones had no CardZone, so moving a card into one
left the CardItem drawn at its old spot. Create a hidden PileZone in
onCustomZoneAdded so cards are reparented and hidden.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lukas Brübach <Bruebach.Lukas@bdosecurity.de>
* [Refactor] Move the remaining zone commands out of game_graphics/zones/
* [Game] Move zone dump request onto ZoneViewZoneLogic per review
---------
Co-authored-by: Lukas Brübach <Bruebach.Lukas@bdosecurity.de>
* [Refactor] Move table row mapping from TableZone into TableZoneLogic
* [Game] Use TableZoneLogic::ROW_COUNT directly per review
* [Format] Match clang-format line breaking in table_zone
---------
Co-authored-by: Lukas Brübach <Bruebach.Lukas@bdosecurity.de>
Folds in the closed#7410 (Move AnnotationDialog from game/ logic to
game_graphics/) now that layers 1-2 are closed and this stack bottoms on
master directly:
- Add game_graphics/dialogs/dlg_annotation.{h,cpp} and move the
QInputDialog subclass there; game/ no longer declares any widget type.
- Add game/player/token_info.h and game/player/move_top_cards_until_options.h.
- Move CardMenuActionType to game/player/card_menu_action_type.h.
- Graphics dialog headers include the new game/ headers instead of
defining the structs themselves.
No behavior change.
Co-authored-by: Lukas Brübach <Bruebach.Lukas@bdosecurity.de>
* [Installer] Stop calling the payload free while an executable is locked
The guard answered "nothing is holding the payload" from two lookups that can
both miss a running instance: Restart Manager does not reliably report a
program's own image or the modules it mapped, and the image path of a process
running under another account cannot be read from the probe at all. A user log
showed exactly that: the first guard passed while cockatrice.exe was running
from the directory, the old uninstaller silently skipped the file it could not
delete, and the update aborted half an uninstall later with "cancelled by user"
after a close attempt the running window ignored.
Ask the file itself. A running image is opened without write sharing, so the
write open replacing it needs is refused with ERROR_SHARING_VIOLATION for as
long as the program runs, while a file that is merely being read still accepts
it. When neither lookup named anybody and a payload executable refuses that
open, the probe answers that the file is in use and that the program holding it
could not be identified - the guard's "could not confirm" dialog, whose Retry
works once the user has closed it - instead of passing the payload as free.
Only the payload executables are tested, not every file the purge removes: a
locked executable proves a program is running and a mapped DLL belongs to a
running executable, while a locked DLL or qt.conf can be the asking process
itself, which is the loop the guard already had. The open is retried once after
300 ms, and only for the files that refused, so a scanner holding a file for a
moment cannot stop an install for nothing.
The Windows probe check now covers that answer: a payload executable held by
the asking process, so that it cannot be named, has to come back as in use
rather than as free.
Co-authored-by: Lukas Brübach <Bruebach.Lukas@bdosecurity.de>
* [Installer] Close running clients over a local socket
The installer could only ask a running client to close with WM_CLOSE, which an instance hidden in the notification area or sitting on its own confirmation cannot answer usefully. Give every client a per-process local socket and have the holder probe ask it there first, falling back to WM_CLOSE for clients from before the socket.
* [Installer] Offer to check again or update by hand when files stay locked
Replace the two-answer guard prompt with force close, close by hand and check again, or cancel. Retry the automatic close while the set of holders changes, and point a cancelled run at the latest release so a user who does not want anything killed has a way forward that is not cancelling the update again.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lukas Brübach <Bruebach.Lukas@bdosecurity.de>
The running-instance lookup named every process whose image path began with the
install directory, subfolders included. Installing into a folder that holds
another application in a subfolder therefore reported that application as
holding the previous version, and nothing the guard offers could clear it: the
close asks cockatrice.exe only, and the end answer refuses anything that is not
a payload program. Both answers were no-ops, so the update could only abort and
tell the user to close a program that was never touching the files.
Name only the programs the payload installs, and only when the image lies in the
install directory itself. A program below the directory that really does hold a
payload file is still named by the Restart Manager lookup, which is the lookup
for that question.
The Windows probe check now covers a payload-named program in a subfolder and a
program the payload does not install; both have to come back as nothing.
Co-authored-by: Lukas Brübach <Bruebach.Lukas@bdosecurity.de>
* [Installer] Request quit for hidden Cockatrice instances and record holders in abort telemetry
* [Installer] Fix compiler warnings in holder probe and installer quit handler
* [VisualDeckStorage] Order the includes the way clang-format wants them
* [Installer] Ask a hidden instance to close, then offer to end it once
The previous attempt had the client answer a registered window message, which
cannot work for the update it was reported on: the instance being replaced is a
client from before that message exists, so it never answers, and the user is
left with "Cockatrice is still running" exactly as reported. Every step that can
free the files has to be the installer's, so the client side is reverted.
The probe now posts WM_CLOSE to the instance's own window whether that window is
on screen or only in the notification area: the request does not need a visible
window, an instance in the tray is the one this update has no other way to
reach, and the confirmation Cockatrice answers with is a window Qt shows itself,
so it is painted - unlike one restored from outside. A visible window is brought
forward first, and Qt's bookkeeping windows stay excluded, because a close to the
notification-area one terminates the instance without its confirmation.
A question of the instance's own no longer suppresses the close. Withholding it
protected nobody: the installer asked the user to close a program it had never
asked, and a current client refuses the close while its confirmation is pending
anyway, leaving the question where it is. The launcher mode keeps the
visible-only rule, because a launcher without a window has already answered its
own close and the wait ends it after a grace instead of asking a user who is not
there.
The guard asked the same question until the user gave up: after the automatic
close failed it offered to end the programs, then re-ran the probe and showed
the same dialog word for word when the answer was No, which is how an abort was
reported three times over. It now asks once - Yes ends the Cockatrice, Oracle
and Servatrice programs the payload installs and says what that costs, No
cancels - and what survives an end is named in the abort instead of being put to
the user as the same question again. The uninstaller's guard and the recovery
path after a failed purge follow the same shape.
Kept: the abort telemetry that records the holders, the close result and the end
result as event data.
---------
Co-authored-by: sentry[bot] <39604003+sentry[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Lukas Brübach <Bruebach.Lukas@bdosecurity.de>
* [Installer] End a launcher that has no window to ask instead of prompting
The in-app updater starts this installer detached and then closes itself. A
client that accepts that close hides its window before it exits, and if it
then hangs in shutdown there is nothing left to ask: the holder probe
deliberately never posts WM_CLOSE to an instance it cannot see a window for,
so the "ask it to close again" answer only repeated itself until the user
picked Cancel and the installation aborted (Sentry COCKATRICE-DESKTOP-J).
The launcher wait now asks the launcher itself before asking the user. A new
probe mode, --close-launcher, answers whether that one process has a window a
close could reach at all; it is limited to a pid that still runs from the
directory being replaced, so a reused process id cannot be hit. When there is
no window, the installer gives the shutdown it already started one full grace
and then ends it through the handle it waited on, which is what the dialog's
Yes answer did. The prompt remains for the case it exists for: a window is up,
the instance may be waiting on its own question, and No now means only "keep
waiting".
The client is left alone: an already-installed version runs the installer
during its own update, so a change there cannot reach the run that aborts.
* [libcockatrice_rng] Include immintrin.h for AVX2 builds in SFMT
---------
Co-authored-by: sentry[bot] <39604003+sentry[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* [Client] Stop reporting local login aborts as missing client features
Local aborts (unusable saved verifier, refused authentication downgrade,
failed scrypt derivation) reuse RespClientUpdateRequired with an empty
feature list, and the handler discarded the reason and advised a client
update. Report the abort with the cause instead, and report a strict
server's challenge_response_auth answer to a credential-less login as the
missing password it is.
* [Client] Keep the login abort messages in one named set
The local login aborts each carried their wording inline at the emit site, so
changing the tone or the remedy meant editing several functions. Collect them
as named constants next to RemoteClient instead, translated at the use sites
with the RemoteClient context so lupdate still picks them up.
* [Client] Reword the login abort explanations to match what happens
The first wording sent users to a server operator to 'migrate' an account,
which operators cannot do, and told them to 'save' a login the client saves by
itself. It also blamed the device for a derivation failure the server's
parameters can cause, and the dialog led with a line that said nothing while
the reason sat in the informative slot.
Say what the client actually does in each case, give the step that works, and
show the reason as the dialog's main text. The unreachable fallback sentence
about the login not reaching the server is gone.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lukas Brübach <Bruebach.Lukas@bdosecurity.de>
* [Client] Report password-reset rate limits instead of a generic failure
sigForgotPasswordError carried no response code, so rate limiting, a
disabled reset feature, an unknown user and a bad token all produced
"contact the server operator". Users who were only rate limited retried,
which kept them rate limited.
* [Client] Move the reset-password warning out of the response switch
---------
Co-authored-by: Lukas Brübach <Bruebach.Lukas@bdosecurity.de>
* [Installer] Recover leftover payload files when previous uninstaller leaves them behind
* [Installer] Fix leftover recovery on the 64-bit auto-uninstall path
- Record the 64-bit uninstaller exit code after ExecWait returns. It was
captured before the call (always empty), so WaitForOldPayloadToDisappear
always aborted before RemoveOldPayloadLeftovers could run.
- Restore the pre-uninstall user-data backup before aborting out of the wait,
including the guard's cancel and probe-failure prompts, so the only copy
cannot be stranded in %TEMP% for the next run to wipe.
- Report the leftover removal as done only when every payload executable is
gone and RetryDllPurge reports no stale DLLs, instead of checking
cockatrice.exe alone.
- Return directly after a successful recovery instead of reusing the poll
counter, so the log stops claiming the directory "was already clear" and
the normal settle delay is kept.
* [Installer] Delete the old uninstaller only after recovery succeeds
RemoveOldPayloadLeftovers cleared the attribute and deleted
$INSTDIR\uninstall.exe on every attempt, before the attempt was known to
work. On failure the installer aborts telling the user to run it again, but
UninstallString then points at a missing uninstaller: ExecWait leaves the
exit code empty, WaitForOldPayloadToDisappear takes the "cancelled or
failed" branch, and RemoveOldPayloadLeftovers is gated on exit code 0, so
no later run can ever get past it - a half-removed old install the previous
revision never produced.
Delete it in rop_done instead, after $OldPayloadRemoved is set.
WriteUninstaller recreates it on success anyway, and nothing in the
success verdict depends on it being gone.
---------
Co-authored-by: sentry[bot] <39604003+sentry[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Lukas Brübach <Bruebach.Lukas@bdosecurity.de>
* [Installer] Offer to end running Cockatrice immediately when auto-close fails
* [Installer] Keep the way out that costs nothing in the first prompt
The prompt now offers to end Cockatrice, so what the deleted close-again text
said has to survive in it: an instance the probe reports as waiting for an
answer to a question of its own has been brought forward, and answering that
window is the way out that ends nothing. Say so, and say where to go when Yes
leaves it listed - Task Manager - so an end that cannot take effect does not
loop on the same dialog.
* [Installer] Bring the comments back in line with the code
GuardCloseTried no longer counts closes, and the file header, CloseHolders and
GuardAppsNotRunning still described an escalation after a second close, as did
the probe's --end-holders note.
* [Installer] End Oracle and Servatrice too when the guard's end answer is confirmed
The guard's end answer only ever stopped cockatrice.exe, so an Oracle holding
the card database or a Servatrice service kept the payload locked and the
prompt came back with nothing left that could free it.
The probe now ends every program the payload installs, services included:
isPayloadProgram() - the list restart_manager_holders already used for its
parent walk - decides the set, so a scanner holding a DLL or a program the
user keeps in the install directory is still named and left to the user. A
service is terminated rather than sent a stop through the SCM, which notices
the process exit and marks it stopped afterwards.
The guard prompt now says what ending costs: an unsaved deck, an unwritten
setting, players on a running Servatrice, and an Oracle mid-way through the
card database. It also keeps the notification-area hint, which the probe's
"has no window to ask" answer depends on, and drops the claim that Oracle
and Servatrice had been brought forward.
* [Installer] Give every running-program prompt the same end-or-retry answers
Four prompts meet a running program and each offered a different set: the
guard ended it, the launcher wait only kept waiting, and the recovery prompt
after a failed purge could only ask Cockatrice to close. With Oracle or
Servatrice holding the files, that last one had no answer that could free
anything - Yes and No both retried the purge and Cancel aborted an install
whose old version was already gone.
All four now follow the guard's shape: one automatic attempt, then a prompt
whose Yes ends the programs it names and whose No retries, with Cancel to
give up.
- RecoverFromHolders closes once and purges before it asks anything, then
offers EndHolders - the same end answer as the guard - instead of a close
the user had to trigger himself.
- WaitForLauncherToExit can end the launcher by pid, the one process it
holds a pid for, rather than looping 60 s waits with Cancel as the only
way out.
- END_COST and AFTER_CLOSING_GUIDANCE are !defines, so the cost of ending
and the guidance for the answers that end nothing read the same in every
prompt.
* [Installer] End the launcher through the handle it was waited on
The "end it" answer used to look the launcher's pid up again after a dialog that
can stay open as long as the user takes, so a pid that had been reused in the
meantime - or a /PID= that was never the launcher - would be terminated instead.
The handle the wait already holds names that process and cannot be handed to
another, so the terminate answer now acts on it.
PROCESS_TERMINATE is requested along with PROCESS_SYNCHRONIZE; when only the
synchronize right is granted the launcher is still waited on and the answer falls
back to asking it to close, instead of reporting a live launcher as gone and
writing the payload over it.
* [Installer] Say what the end answer ends, and report a failed end
The prompt offered "end every program listed above", but EndHolders only ends the
programs the payload installs: a scanner holding a payload DLL, or a service the
Restart Manager names by its long name, was listed and then silently left alone, so
Yes looked like it did nothing and the same dialog came back unchanged.
The wording now says which programs Yes ends and that anything else has to be closed
by hand, and the round after an end that did not free the files says so, so the same
dialog no longer reappears word for word. The three prompts are one macro so they
cannot drift apart again.
The added sentences eat into the 1024 characters one NSIS string holds, so the
holder line's budget drops from 400 to 320 characters to keep the longest message
(cancel line included) inside it: 977 characters, measured against the worst case
the probe can produce.
---------
Co-authored-by: sentry[bot] <39604003+sentry[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Lukas Brübach <Bruebach.Lukas@bdosecurity.de>
* [Updater] Refuse a close that arrives while one is already asking
MainWindow::closeEvent() had a re-entrancy guard that returned without touching
the event. A QCloseEvent is accepted unless something ignores it, so a second
close request - an installer replacing our files posts one every 30 s - accepted
the close while the first one was still blocked on its own confirmation. close()
then hid this window, hid the confirmation dialog with it, and left the process
running inside the nested loop that dialog had opened: no window, no way to
answer it, and every later close request accepted into the same dead end. That
is what an update looked like when it could not close a running client, and it
is why the installer could name the process, bring it forward and ask it to
close for minutes without anything happening.
Track how far the shutdown has got instead. While a confirmation is up, a close
from anywhere else is refused, which leaves the question in front of the user;
once the shutdown has been accepted, a duplicate close (Qt delivers the event
twice on some platforms) is accepted again so it cannot cancel the quit.
* [Installer] Leave an instance that is asking a question alone
An instance that answered a close by hiding rather than quitting - the state the
client used to get into - has no visible window left, and the confirmation it is
waiting on is hidden with the window that owns it. The close probe only ever
looked at visible windows, so it restored the main window, posted WM_CLOSE into
the same dead end, and reported "still running" without saying why.
Show every window the instance left hidden before choosing the one to close, and
skip the close when the window it would reach is disabled: a modal dialog of the
instance's own is up, and posting the close then only hides the question again.
Name what is left of the window in the report as well - gone, still open, hidden
again, and whether the thread answers at all - so the log tells a refused close
from one that was never delivered.
* [Installer] Offer to end a Cockatrice that will not close
A close is a request, and an instance that does not answer it - waiting on a
question nobody is looking at, or stuck where a close cannot reach - leaves the
user with no way forward: the files cannot be replaced while it runs, and
clicking Yes again only repeats the request.
After a second close that changed nothing, offer the only thing that can free
the files: end it. The prompt says what it costs - an unsaved deck, a running
game or a setting it has not written yet - the default button is the safe one,
and it is a separate answer rather than a relabelled "Yes", so it is not
reached by clicking through the close prompt. Only cockatrice.exe is ever
ended: Oracle writes the card database in place and Servatrice is a service, so
both are named and left to the user, exactly as they are for the close.
The probe gains an --end-holders mode for it, and the uninstaller's guard gets
the same offer.
* [Installer] Never name the process that is doing the asking
The old uninstaller is started with _?= so it runs in place, from the very
directory it is emptying, and an installer can be downloaded into the folder it
installs to. Both are then processes running from the directory, so the probe
named them - and the guard asked the user to close the program that was asking.
That question cannot be answered: a close and the end offer both skip anything
that is not cockatrice.exe, so the guard repeated itself until the update or the
uninstall was cancelled.
The probe and the processes that started it are now never named, by either
lookup. The walk up the parent chain stops at the first program the payload
installs, because in an in-app update the installer's own parent is the
Cockatrice instance being replaced - the one the guard exists to name.
The Windows check held its locked file in the script that starts the probe, so
that holder is excluded by design now and the check read it as "nothing found".
It holds the file from a process of its own instead, and asserts the exclusion
itself: a file that only the asking process holds comes back as nothing.
* [Installer] Restore only the windows a user could answer
Showing every hidden window an instance owns put Qt's own bookkeeping windows on
screen: the tray icon keeps one to receive the TaskbarCreated message, styled
WS_OVERLAPPED and titled QTrayIconMessageWindow. Restored, it is an empty white
rectangle in the taskbar with no title bar to close it - it has no window
procedure that would hide it again, and the process is busy in the very loop the
restore is meant to break, so it stayed until the process was force-ended.
Only framed, non-empty windows are restored and considered for the close now.
That also keeps the close off Qt's tray window, which answers WM_CLOSE by asking
the application to terminate - a quit that skips the confirmation the close is
supposed to reach.
* [Installer] Uninstall the previous version before installing over it
A regular install over an existing one asked "a previous version must be
uninstalled", then ran the old uninstaller interactively. That uninstaller
put its confirmation page behind the installer window, where it could not be
answered, and it only removed the installation after the installer had
already written the new one over it.
Run the previous version's uninstaller silently instead. The installer has
already asked the question the user answered, so a second, hidden confirmation
is pure risk: with /S there is no window to be behind, and ExecWait is then
waiting for something that cannot outlive it. QuietUninstallString is used
when the old installation has one, otherwise /S is appended.
ExecWait only waits while the uninstaller runs in place: one that did not get
a usable _?= copies itself to %TEMP% and returns at once, while the copy keeps
deleting - which is how an uninstall can finish after the install it was
supposed to precede. Log the exit code and wait for the old cockatrice.exe to
disappear before restoring user data or writing anything, and abort with a
message instead of installing into a directory that is still being emptied.
Cancelling the "must be uninstalled" prompt now quits the installer; it used
to skip the page and install over the old version anyway.
* [Installer] Do not show windows the application has hidden
The guard restored every hidden window an instance owned before asking it to
close, so that a confirmation hidden together with its window would come back.
Windows does as it is told and shows them; the application does not, because Qt
still believes they are hidden and never paints them. What the user gets is a
blank white rectangle, on screen and on the taskbar, that answers nothing - and
the question it was meant to bring back is not answerable in it either.
An instance with no window a user could answer is named and left to the user
instead, and the prompt says what to do about it: open it from the notification
area. Ending it stays the last resort, offered once a close has been asked for
twice.
The abort after a failed uninstall now says what it saw - the old version is
still there after its uninstaller ran - instead of promising a removal that is
not happening, which is the state a cancelled old uninstaller leaves behind.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lukas Brübach <Bruebach.Lukas@bdosecurity.de>
* [Installer] Check for running instances with the Restart Manager probe
The running-instance guard was built on powershell.exe started from the
32-bit NSIS stub, which is the 32-bit Windows PowerShell: its Get-Process
cannot read the path of a 64-bit process, so a running 64-bit Cockatrice
was reported as not running, the update went ahead, and the purge then
failed on the DLLs that instance still had mapped.
Use tools/installer-holder-probe instead - the same Restart Manager lookup
the abort path already had - before anything is replaced and in the
uninstaller as well. It is bitness-agnostic, so the Sysnative and WMI
fallbacks are gone.
The guard looks only at the payload, asks Cockatrice to close once by
itself (WM_CLOSE, the same request as the window's close button) and then
offers close again / retry after closing by hand / cancel for whatever the
close cannot reach - Oracle writes the card database in place, Servatrice
has no window - without force-stopping anything. A failed purge offers the
same close-and-retry, tries one last purge when nobody is named, and every
dialog shows in every mode: a silent reinstall stays silent until
something goes wrong.
* [Installer] Name processes running from the install directory
The running-instance guard answers from the Restart Manager, which reports
who has a file open. A running instance does not have to have one open: its
own image and the modules it loaded are mapped into it rather than opened by
it, and a mapping is not reliably reported. That is the state the probe was
added for - every DLL still on disk, an instance running from the directory,
and "nothing is holding them any more" as the answer.
A guard built on file handles alone is blind to exactly that instance, so it
passes, the purge fails, the holder lookup after it names nobody either, and
the install ends in a warning that no running program was found: no close is
attempted and no retry is offered. A manual install with another instance
open never asks it to close at all.
Name every process whose image lives in the directory being replaced as
well, with the same bitness-safe QueryFullProcessImageNameW the probe
already uses to label its holders. The image lookup is listed first - it is
the instance the user is asked to close - and the Restart Manager entries
follow with the pids already named dropped, so the close still reaches
everything that holds a file. A Restart Manager call that fails only makes
the probe unable to answer when the image lookup named nobody either.
Ask instead of dead-ending when the probe cannot answer at all: Retry checks
again, Ignore carries on, Abort cancels, in the installer and the uninstaller
alike, and the abort dialog says the check failed instead of claiming no
running program was found.
The Windows CI probe check covers the new lookup with a process started from
the directory that holds no file open.
* [Installer] Offer to wait again when the launcher has not exited
A client that is still closing after 60 s is usually not hung: it is showing
its own "quit anyway?" confirmation for an unsaved deck, an open game or a
card database update, and the user is the one who has to answer it. The
installer answered that with a plain warning and stopped, so the only way
forward was to close Cockatrice by hand and run the update again - which on
an in-app update means finding the downloaded installer.
Ask instead: Retry brings the client to the front, asks it to close again
(WM_CLOSE, nothing forced) and keeps waiting on its handle, Cancel stops as
before. There is no "install anyway" answer because a live process has its
image and Qt DLLs mapped, so writing the payload over them is the broken
install this wait exists to prevent - and the guard that runs right after
names the same process by its image path and stops there, so ignoring would
only move the same question a moment later.
* [Installer] Ask about a launcher that has not exited after ten seconds
A minute of silence is a long time to sit in front of an installer that has no
window yet, and the case it is waiting for is not a slow flush: a client that
started an update exits in well under a second, so a minute means it is almost
always showing its own "quit anyway?" confirmation with nobody looking at it.
Wait ten seconds for the first question instead, and the full grace for the
ones after it. The normal path is untouched - WaitForSingleObject returns as
soon as the handle signals, so a client that exits in 200 ms still costs 200
ms - and answering the first question once does not turn into a stream of
prompts while the user is in Cockatrice's window.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lukas Brübach <Bruebach.Lukas@bdosecurity.de>
